Developed by two Harvard scientists and FDA-cleared in 2010, CoolSculpting has become a leader in non-invasive fat reduction. In fact, over six million CoolSculpting treatments have been performed worldwide.
Despite its well-known safety and efficacy, women and men considering body contouring may wonder: How does CoolSculpting compare to other treatments?
Continue reading as we examine CoolSculpting’s benefits in relation to liposuction, Velashape, Zerona, SculpSure, and truSculpt.
CoolSculpting vs. Liposuction
While CoolSculpting is a completely, liposuction is a surgical procedure. Accordingly, liposuction requires incisions, anesthesia (general or local), increased risk, and downtime.
In comparison, CoolSculpting doesn’t necessitate any cutting, anesthetic, or recovery, making it a safer and more efficient alternative for many patients.
CoolSculpting vs. Velashape
Velashape is a non-surgical treatment that uses radiofrequency, laser energy, and suction massage to reduce fat and cellulite. However, it is often cited as less efficient and reliable than CoolSculpting.
Additionally, CoolSculpting operates with a precise cooling technology, and patients can comfortably read, watch tv, or relax during the procedure.
With Velashape, the skin constantly needs to be iced, and there’s also the possibility of burns to the skin.
CoolSculpting vs. Zerona
Zerona is another non-invasive body contouring option. It liquefies and shrinks fat cells and tightens skin with laser-based energy. In order for Zerona to be effective, patients must undergo a 40-minute treatment every two days for 15 days.
This level of commitment is in stark contrast to CoolSculpting, which can produce optimal outcomes in as little as one 35-minute treatment.
What’s more, CoolSculpting destroys and eliminates fat cells, producing permanent results. Because Zerona only shrinks fat cells, it offers only temporary fat reduction.
CoolSculpting vs. SculpSure
While CoolSculpting uses freezing temperatures to trigger fat cell death, SculpSure employs laser-based energy to heat and kill fat cells.
Both treatments can target many of the same fatty areas and permanently eliminate fat via natural cleansing.
Nevertheless, CoolSculpting received FDA-approval several years before SculpSure and has earned a more-established and trusted reputation among providers and patients.
CoolSculpting vs. truSculpt
Using a small, flat handpiece, truSculpt delivers radiofrequency to isolated bulges in order to destroy fat cells.
Alternatively, CoolSculpting offers seven different applicators that are designed to fit the body’s natural contours and treat a much larger area of fat. This difference means increased treatment efficacy and efficiency.
If you are considering body contouring in Arlington, VA and want to learn more about how CoolSculpting compares to other treatments, please call Laser of Arlington today to schedule a comprehensive consultation.